Other stories

The Broken Places – by Frances Peck

The Broken Places – by Frances Peck

I wasn’t sure I was ready for a book about the ‘Big One’ — you know, the long-feared earthquake said to be looming along the West Coast, but Peck had a way of getting me to turn the pages.
Intrigued by the characters, I almost couldn’t wait for the Vancouver ground I live on to shake, only in a fictionalized story. Broken relationships in a now-broken city and complex characters in now-convoluted situations were magnified by the way Frances Peck built her story and her book.

Sometimes it takes a physical or emotional shake to help us reconsider the lack of balance in our lives. Still, by the end of the book I was relieved to be on unbroken ground.

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories
A Time of Light and Shadow — by Ella Harvey

A Time of Light and Shadow — by Ella Harvey

A Time of Light and Shadow by Ella Harvey is a page-turner book. It is the physical, visual, and romantic account of a female solo traveler back then. It is also the emotional account of a nurse who doesn’t hesitate to veer from serene sceneries to humanitarian devastation. The book is an escape for women who, then, didn’t have to mind their safety when walking around or meeting a stranger. Young travelers will be inspired by the author’s gained insights as she returns to India many years later. It is also a reminder that nursing is still a selfless vocation. This book will take you to more places than the story itself. 

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories
Work in (Endless) Progress

Work in (Endless) Progress

Thirty drafts? In how many years did you say?” It was my reaction more than my questions to a memoir instructor. After five years, I, too, have completed many drafts, not as quantifiable as those of the instructor since I write digitally and not longhand.

Today, my 80,000-word manuscript is as firmly grounded on the page as it is in my mind—pending future agents’ assessments. And yet doubts are hindering me from moving forward.

So, what happened during those years?

Two years after I completed the first draft, I hired an editor only to discover later that it had been too early for that. Of course, I benefited from copy editing and other syntax alerts and pertinent questions, but my manuscript wasn’t ready for a line-by-line edit. Much was still unclear even to me. I should have asked for an evaluation, a manuscript critique, or at least development guidance first.

A year later, my manuscript was ‘again’ as ready as my skills allowed, so I contacted (Canadian) agents. The guidelines of the first one required a 50-page book proposal, leading to a six-week-long, full-days, and late-nights daunting project. The rejection led to literary agencies with ‘less challenging guidelines’—however, an agent who is interested in a memoir will ask for the book proposal. With each new query, though, my critique of the previous one kicked in and exposed its weaknesses. Eight queries yielded four formal rejections and four implicit ones, plus months of waiting. I was hoping for a miracle—even now-famous authors admit that rejections by the dozens aren’t unusual. 

Nevertheless, discouraged by the process, I stopped querying but kept working.

Over two more years, my narrative improved in ways that weren’t obvious earlier. I realized that I had not gained a full perspective on my memoir; a personal story can’t be rushed.

Editing led to deleting (the hardest part) as well as developing, tweaking, copying/pasting, splitting chapters, and other fact-checking. The text got sharper—unclear thoughts and blurry transitions couldn’t hide in verbiage anymore.

Unlike an autobiography, a memoir doesn’t have to be chronological, but my flashbacks needed logical smooth triggering and the dramatic backbone of my narrative breathing space. Dynamic descriptions—as in show, don’t tell—gave it depth and substance. Reading excerpts at a conference returned encouraging critiques. What’s more, it pointed to tongue-tied traps and lack of musicality in sentences—hence the need to practice.

Still, a troubling little voice kept telling me something was missing. At a loss to identify what it was, my manuscript joined earlier drafts in my digital folder. Until I read two quotes that shuffled my mind like a deck of cards—the epiphany had revealed itself. I then played solitaire until the parts of my story found their rightful place.

It was time for more advanced readers—five friends since my first draft.

Their comments were always useful, but I knew their evaluation couldn’t be objective. I, too, had read someone’s manuscript, deemed a total rewrite by an editor—it read as the writer talked, and with a punctuation protocol of her own making. Yet it was engaging, funny, and despite her creative imagery and a rich vocabulary, it was indeed only the first draft. I had nevertheless binge-read this page-turner because I knew the writer, and I was curious for more.

I hope to give my fellow writers, those who are perhaps stuck in the doldrums of doubt, a sense of kinship in the grueling process of writing a book, especially a memoir. You are not alone to feel that way!

Meanwhile, I hope that the power of accountability will push me forward. I have more work to do, of a different type of writing. I know the pros and cons of seeking an agent versus going straight to a publisher; either way, I should seek endorsements—advance praise, or blurb—to lend credibility to my story. And I need a “platform.” Are you saying I need a blog too? Worst of all, for peace of mind, shouldn’t I turn my memoir into a novel?

Oh my… To be continued…

Edited. Original article published in WordWorks Spring 2021

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories
Interview of a Memoirist

Interview of a Memoirist

In her eighties, American-born Susan Tiberghien’s demeanor is both endearing and engaging. She doesn’t just smile, she glows. Her eyes connect intently as she listens, or replies in a modulated voice, her hands often reaching for yours or holding your shoulders.

After my email, a few years ago, she had accepted to meet in a café in Geneva, Switzerland, where she lives. Her genuine interest and her writing insights had then inspired me to attend the summer International Women’s Writing Guild conference (IWWG) in Pennsylvania. A pillar of the Guild, she hasn’t missed a conference since 1990. There, she gave memoir and personal narrative workshops every day and attended open readings at night. Always sought after whether she was walking, eating, or in conversation, we had finally found time for this interview.

You have been teaching for over twenty-five years in Europe, at the IWWG conferences, and various venues in the United States. You published five books and you are writing another one. What drives you?

What drives me is my passion for writing and teaching, and finding the balance between the two. I want to share how writing can give meaning to one’s life.  Writers are here to witness; it’s both a personal and political responsibility.

What is the most common misconception about the genre?

A memoir is a window into your life. It’s a slice of your life that could be part of your autobiography, but it’s not your whole life. It usually begins with a longing, a need. The deeper the need is, the deeper the story.

What is the process for writing a memoir?

You must find what your subject is going to be—it’s called the windowthen you open it. The feelings that come with memories will set the creative process.

You can have many subjects in your memoir, and you can write many memoirs because you have many windows in your house.

You wrote several memoirs; did you choose the genre, or did it choose you?

The memoir genre chose me when I was attending an IWWG conference and writing a novel at the time. One day, I was happily sharing the work I was doing in Jungian analysis, and the next morning I remembered dreaming the title and the chapters of Looking for Gold, a memoir that would deepen my creativity by writing from dreams.     

Precisely, In Looking for Gold: A Year in Jungian Analysis, you—as a lay student of C.G. Jung—guide us to remember a dream and show us how to follow it until we find a living image. Where does that living image take us?

Each chapter of this book is the image of a dream. I look in the dream for an image that is alive and focus on it until it takes me on its path into my deeper self—and to the story. It requires stillness of mind, so the dream that wishes to be remembered comes out. Then the narrative follows. To write a memoir, we must go first into our inner self because that’s how we find who we are, which I share in my other book, Circling to the Center.

In One Year to a Writing Life: Twelve Lessons to Deepen Every Writer’s Art and Craft, deemed a book that many writers wished they had when they started, you say that journaling is a gift, how so?

It brings together the different steps towards the writing life. One year is maybe a bit short, but we can follow the program, and we start with journaling; it’s the foundation; it’s the first step. It’s a gift to ourselves because through our journals we understand who we are, and get a deeper understanding of the world.

How does a writer transition from journaling to memoir writing?

I call my journal entries gleanings. When I observe nature on a walk, it talks to me. Think of it as the seed for a story! It might lead you to write about a memory and to expand it into a memoir.

In Side by Side: Writing Your Love Story, you share a family drama. To include sensitive truth or not, is that the question?

We had 55 years of marriage when I wrote it; it’s 58 years now. We have to speak about the happy memories because I believe that, if we live from these happy memories, we create new ones. But there are also less happy memories, so—because in writing a memoir we must be honest with ourselves—I had to include our family’s difficult memories.

I talk about it thinking of an oak leaf—always with an image from nature, a living image. On an oak leaf, there are some black spots and if you tear them off the whole leaf falls apart, but if you write about them and speak about them, I think they can lead you. It’s like the crack in a jug; it lets the light in.

Should only the truth be told?

When we write a memoir, we must decide what part goes in and what part stays out. In Side by Side some of the parts, perhaps about my parents, didn’t fit into my memoir of a long marriage. The parts that don’t fit can become the subject of another memoir.

Should a writer take a pen name?

I don’t think we need to take a pen name. When I write about somebody in my family, I show it to them first. When William Zinsser was writing Inventing the Truth he interviewed author Annie Dillard, asking her this question; that’s what she did.

Another answer is found in Mimi Schwartz‘s book Good Neighbours, Bad Times: Echoes of my Father’s German Village. She writes about going back to Germany to discover the roots of her father. In the preface, she writes that this is how she remembers what she discovered about her father’s life. She protects herself right from the beginning.

You often use quotes. Why are they good tools for writers?

Yes, I use excerpts when I teach, and quotes when I write.

I think we don’t come into the world alone. Amy Clampitt, the celebrated poet, says that we come on the shoulders of other writers. And so, I want to honor these other writers because I learn from them. They are good tools because they guide us.

Footsteps: In Love with a Frenchman is another portable workshop in which you discuss the challenges of blending cultures through marriage, and you share vignettes. Is this memoir collection a sub-genre?

It’s a mosaic. I wrote about the first 38 years of our relationship, the first 30 years taking place with moves, sometimes back and forth, from France, Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland. It’s about crossing cultures almost every year while raising five children and bringing the sixth one in from Vietnam.

So I blend the cultures into a collection of parts of our life together. It’s different pieces—photos, recipes, prose, and poetry—put into a mosaic. I think a mosaic is a wonderful image for a memoir. Again, we focus on a subject, we open a window, and the structure could be this mosaic. The process is like putting stones together to find a pattern, the pattern of our life.

Writers often feel insecure about their writing, what gave you confidence in yours?

I started—really writing—when I turned fifty; the family came first. I went to my first workshop. I was insecure in my writing, but I always wanted to write. Then in a group of writers, somebody suggested where to send our pieces, and suggested I send mine to the London Financial Times. They had a monthly review. One piece was accepted and then another. I started gaining confidence. Then they gave me the back page of their review, so, for a year, I was writing a story each month for their monthly magazine Resident Abroad. The same thing happened with Christian Science Monitor. Living in Europe, I didn’t know about it, but somebody in a writing group suggested it. Join a writing group and let people suggest the markets to you!

What is the state of memoir publishing and readership?

Memoir publishing is still a very popular genre. We thought it had maybe peaked ten years ago, but it continues to be popular. People want to know how other people are living to live more deeply themselves.

Do you read more than you write?

I read a lot. I don’t read more than I write, I don’t think; perhaps, yes; I read maybe several hours a day. And I read as a writer, with a pencil.

What’s your writing ritual?

I start my day at my desk in my small study and sit in stillness. After a silent prayer or a wordless meditation, I then write, usually a journal entry, although not every day. If I go for a walk, I look around and might go home writing about a pebble I picked. Among other pebbles, it might look ordinary, but look at it carefully, and the Alchemy of Imagination will expand the image.

What’s in front of you on your desk that inspires you?

Things that center me: photos of my children, little images from my books, a frog. I have a frog because in Looking for Gold I have a whole chapter about frogs.

Does your family read your writing?

I offer it to them. I know my husband does. From time to time they do. They haven’t all read my books.

Any other comments you wish to offer?

I cannot emphasize enough that writers need to join a group, to share their writing, to learn from others, and to give their ‘own’ advice and their ‘own’ little bits of gold.  Again, find an association like IWWG—The International Writing Women’s Guild— or one in your area. For me, it has been a bridge between a deeper understanding of myself, and better writing.

Original article published in WordWorks (p. 21-25) Fall 2016

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

A Traveller’s Notebook— by Grant Eustace—Review

The Timeless Good and Bad of Decades of Trips 

British author Grant Eustace will tell you that he is a traveling writer and not a travel writer. Nobody makes a writer write, yet writers keep writing because they can’t help it. A professional writer in the field of communication (audio, print, and film), Eustace always jotted notes during several decades of international trips as a consultant.

As for whether a traveler differs from a tourist, “The real traveler is the one taking notes,” he says. And so, he did, in the notebook that he never leaves home without. Sixty countries later, the book is a lively narrative about his observations. Overall, it’s a reckoning between pleasure and frustration. What’s more, he was always eager to take that unsure step that could lead to that lucky encounter.

As you embark on his voyage around the world, often to recurring destinations depending on the chapters’ themes, A Traveller’s Notebook gives you incremental information about the noteworthy.

When Eustace shares his road travel notes, from the perspective of driving or being driven, you’ll find yourself in Gibraltar, where cars must stop to let airplanes land—the road crosses the runway. As for flying, he takes you on his nearly fatal landing of an aircraft, which he obviously lived to write about. Somewhere along the way, you learn that he was an officer in the Royal Navy and a helicopter pilot.

Eustace shares the incongruous sides of travel in a medley of subjects, expressed with attention-grabbing Britishism. And if interest peaks because of a place you visited, Eustace probably had a unique encounter there.

Battlefields might not be your favorite topic, but it would be your loss to skip that part. Eustace is passionate about history, so you’d miss a remarkable crash course in the American Wars, Spanish Inquisition, and WWII. After all, he writes historical documentaries and authored a historical novel.

Spoiler alert: Eustace was researching Rommel’s last days when he found a telegram—in a largely unsorted stack of documents that a wary curator eventually dug out for him. Thanks to his military background, Eustace immediately recognized the message as a war signal. In brief, the document had been ‘lost in transition’ and to a not-so-appropriate filing venue. That discovery proved him right in his relentless search for happenstance.

Eustace’s writing genre equally engages the armchair traveler with a conversational style spiced with humor. He owes this to writing plays and series for BBC Radio 4 and currently for BBC World Services. He loves a good repartee, too. “I am a Protestant in a Catholic country that’s 100% voodoo,” an otherwise off-camera gem of a comment by the then-British Ambassador to Haiti.

In the food chapter, you won’t know whether Eustace is a home cook, but he held his own on culinary encounters, called ‘cultural delicacies.’ As for his take on travel companions, and about women, he comes across as a discerning man who keeps his distance, perhaps out of concern for gender misrepresentation. A territory that decades of matrimony and corporate life have taught him well.

First published in 2010 Suite101

 

A Traveler’s Notebook by Grant Eustace (MCArnott)
E-book format: Authorsonline.co.uk Eustace G. (2011). A Traveller’s Notebook. England. A Bright Pen Book. ISBN 978-07552-1353-5. (MCArnott)

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

Back to Baking – Review

The ABCs of Cookbook Writing

“Eighty percent of being a pastry chef is to save a disaster from happening,” Anna Olson says. I have known of such scientific disasters. I hope Back to Baking will help me avoid future ones.

At a fundraiser of the KidSafe Project Society, “Writing about Food: Speaking of Taste Buds,” on the Vancouver UBC campus is where Anna Olson tells us what she does best—bake and write recipes.

Something About Anna Olson

Of Slavic origin, Anna Olson was born in Georgia (USA) and grew up in Ontario (Canada). Kindly assertive, yet self-defined as shy, she could be one of your friends although few of them, if any, might be TV hosts, or authors, let alone pastry chefs.

Olson became a pastry chef to relax. The more stressed she was, the more she baked. She even baked her way through Political Sciences and Law and became a broker until a doomed day in the stock market sent her home with the irrepressible urge to handle kitchen tools and baking ingredients. Then began a weigh, whisk, and whip marathon.  

Six baking books later, Olson only shares original recipes in Back to Baking. Writing them was about testing and re-testing new combinations of flavors while scribbling and editing. This demands integrity and for 200 recipes developed over ten years, passion.

Recipe for Writing a Baking Book

First, Olson chooses a theme and then creates an outline, keeping in mind that the project must appeal as much to home bakers as to her publisher’s business vision. Only then can she let inspiration flow. When it’s done, holding the book for the first time is a delicious gratification, like perfect meringue melting in your mouth.

The recipe for writing a baking book is two-fold. The baking is only half of the book, the other half is the cover. You have to lure your audience and that’s what the Back to Baking book cover does. A calming eye-pleaser of pastels, a blue sky as background to the cloud-white icing of a perfect cake, and Olson’s lilac blouse are enticing enough. Don’t let her smile fool you into believing that baking is a piece of cake. The inoffensive-looking spatula she holds might hint at her comment in Taste magazine, “A kitchen is not a democracy.”

The first pages serve as the sometimes-overlooked introduction, but clusters of small banners catch the attention: Dairy-FREE, egg-FREE, gluten-FREE, LOW-fat, LOW-sugar, and foundation RECIPE. The message is clear: all recipes consider diet restrictions and preferences. Furthermore, the book is a guide for all levels of skills, including your first-ever batch of brownies.

Olson shares new baking techniques and judicious tips to ease life in the kitchen. She insists that precise measurements are essential in baking. She recommends checking the accuracy of your scale, and the volume of your measuring cups. As for to-freeze-or-not-to-freeze baked goods, it depends on their sugar content—sugar gets wet even when refrigerated.

The Battle of the Yield and the Bane of the Baking Time

Anna Olson hosts the TV show Fresh on the Food Network, but how does she operate in the privacy of her home kitchen? Like any creative process, baking is a matter of focus.

The discussion continues in the reminiscing mode of a typical day. “So… today, shall I create a cake, muffins, or a tiramisu?” Playing the part, she then recites a basic recipe: five egg yolks, one cup of cream, half a cup of sugar, a quarter cup of brandy… Meanwhile, the interest of the audience rises like a soufflé.

She has a way to make you salivate with rhetorical questions. Will it be sticky or creamy? Should vanilla enhance the taste? How about incorporating fruit? Cranberries? Ah… beware of cranberries because they float; fruit compote might be a better idea. As the inflections of her voice go up and down and her hands twirl in and out, her face expresses what she says.

Olson explains that her recipes improved from her mishaps, and from questions she received. ‘Between 12 and 18 cookies’ is no acceptable entry in a cookbook. Then comes the unavoidable baking time bane, ignoring oven issues greatly endangers the fate of a recipe. An additional clue is music to my ears: an ‘overly thin’ batter might be just right.

Women as Professional Chefs

Anna Olson learned culinary arts in Vail, Colorado, at Johnson and Wales University, and practiced for 15 years at restaurants in the United States. At the time, it was the duty of the line cooks to make desserts. Since she already had a personal collection of recipes, she took the opportunity to bake what she liked never mind the notorious kitchen conflicts.

In 1995, she returned to Ontario to work at the Inn on the Twenty, where she met and married her future business partner, Executive Chef Michael Olson.

As a pastry chef, she learned the hard way. First, pastry work begins in the early morning with physical work, holding bowls of up to 60 quarts. Second is the psychologically challenging culinary arts, operating in an industry in which women must be resilient and driven.

 “Baking may be regarded as a science, but it’s the chemistry between the ingredients and the cook that gives desserts life. Baking is done out of love, to share with family and friends, to see them smile,” she writes in her book. Let’s get baking!

First published 2012 Suite101.com

The Back to Baking Book The ABCs of Cookbook Writing
Photo Credit: MCArnott

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

Ladurée’s French Macarons

From Paris to New York

It was only a matter of time until the Parisian institution and its prized French macarons would delight the gourmet New Yorkers’ sweet tooth. With its distinctive wood-paneled exterior in an almond green, Ladurée has opened at 864, Madison Avenue. The sweet confections please the tastebuds and the eyes, besides making for perfect gifts too—the Eugénie Box with its decor à la Versailles, for one.

Ladurée Salon de Thé at Rue Royale

The Parisian original location defies the appeal of any jewelry store. The room reminisces of the leisure times of the past, with ceiling paintings inspired by the techniques used at the Sistine Chapel, etched glass, polished brass trimmings, and framed mirrors on paneled walls. Shaded lamps on the marble counter complete the elegant atmosphere as they gleam on macarons and scrumptious pastries.

Sitting in the café area, we eye the cheerful, natural colors of the multi-flavor meringues in refrigerated display cases. Often copied but never matched despite the recipe books, you get more than what you see. Ladurée will only say that they are a combination of almonds, sugar, eggs, and the elusive touch of je-ne-sais-quoi, a secret pinch of know-how.

You may now ask, is it macarons or macaroons? In brief, Ladurée’s delicacies are called macarons. Macaroons are made of shredded coconut and macarons of almond meal. Both are made with egg whites and they are gluten-free since there is no flour.

I hesitate until I choose vanilla, praline, black currant, then licorice, as I would select light to strong cheeses. The confection consists of a crème filling holding together two delicate meringue shells. A bite into it turns into it a blissful mixture of textures and sweetness. Unlike imitations, the meringue doesn’t break, it melts, and the ratio with the filling is just right, and although it’s sweet, it’s not overly sweet.

I sip tea to prepare my palate for each flavor, taking my time in this environment conducive to enjoying the moment. “A weakness for sweets is a noble approach to everyday living,” since I couldn’t agree more with the store philosophy, I also indulge in a larger version of a macaron, with fresh raspberries for good measure.

Ladurée Extended Product Line

With its penchant for refinement, Ladurée has extended its product line to merchandise well-suited for sophistication, and packaged in an elegant gift box:

  • Chocolate boxes with names such as Souris-Chérie and Incomparable Box
  • Cookies (called biscuits) such as Langues de Chat and Tuiles
  • Cakes such as the Black Forest Gâteau in the shape of a pair of cherries
  • Champagne Billecart-Salmon: A noble Blanc de Blanc dedicated to purists
  • Candles: Adagio and Othello release a romantic glow and a voluptuous scent
  • Beauty Collection: Violet face water, bonbon shower gel, almond face cream
  • Home fragrances to wrap your home in the chic atmosphere of a salon
  • Baby Collection: Embroidered bibs (with a box of macarons for the new Mom)
  • Shopping bags: Do it in style with a Charms Grey or Mademoiselle Fifi bag
  • Gift collection: Smart key chains, scarves, labels, ink stamps, and scrapbooks

Breakfast, lunch, dinner, or a party at one of Ladurée’s houses is akin to dreaming of being Madame de Pompadour’s guest. Closer to reality, you would have sent an invitation to friends—on a Ladurée e-card.

The Globalization of a Tradition

Originally founded in 1896, Ladurée macarons were a secret known only to Parisians and select visitors, then the family-owned business became an institution. In 1993, Ladurée’s name for traditional quality expanded with a new line of flavors and products for the discerning consumer. A new store even opened on the Champs-Elysées under the leadership of Pastry Chef Paul Hermé, and dozen more worldwide. The rest is sweet history.

Ladurée bakery at 16, rue Royale, Paris (MCArnott)
Ladurée bakery at 16, rue Royale, Paris (MCArnott)

First published 2011 Suite101.com

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

Women in Film and Television: Breakfast at the Grind

Facts and Fiction About Women in the Film Industry

The place is The Grind and Gallery Coffee Bar in Vancouver, BC. The event, a networking session organized by Women in Film and Television (WIFTV) and held on the third Tuesday of every month—no pre-registration necessary.

Hosted by Deb Sears—Actor at Vancouver Talent Management—the guest speaker is Katherine Monk—a member of the Alliance of Women Film Journalists—who shares her views on the reality of women in filmmaking.

After 20 years in the media, Katherine Monk speaks her mind. Not that she never did before, but her recent participation at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) highlighted a fact that is music to her ears. In this male-dominated industry, women in film are trending again.

Monk sees it as the third and perhaps the fourth wave of women calling the shots. Although concern lurks while women try to survive the crash through the infamous glass ceiling, they continue to narrow the gap in gender parity in the media industry. What would a veteran tell a mixed audience of women seeking not only networking but also mentoring? Facts.

The Facts

  • In industry circles, the female filmmaker is of questionable status. Not men.
  • Women seem to make tactical errors, leading to elusive careers.
  • Success is all about optics, what you are projecting.
  • Women need to own the entitlement of being as creative as men.
  • TIFF saw a three-fold increase in female participants this year.
  • Unlike in previous years, women entered more narratives than documentaries.

How to Dispel and Debunk the Fiction

On the one hand, gender inequity drags women filmmaking down. Any film categorized as a “woman’s story” gets a lesser profit margin. On the other hand, the majority of the theatre-going audience consists of women between 35-45 years of age. So, shouldn’t women produce films for their audience? Since women love stories about women, “Make Oprah stories,” Monk says, because “success in the visibility means nothing.” What Monk means is, make something for the joy of it, for its life meaning, do what you like because you will find a niche market. She reflects on the success of Precious, a dark story for women that has struck a chord at the box office.

Furthermore, after women make their first movie, they face a roadblock to the second one. Female filmmakers think they have to appeal to the same audience and try to make a similar type of film. If women engage in the story of their film, whatever the subject, their passion will come through and the community will follow.

Women have notoriously had trouble getting financing, an excuse that Monk now throws out. “Find capital yourself,” she says, “capitalize on new times since technology allows you to make films on a small budget.” Besides, from a technical angle, “even an eight-year-old could cut a movie today.”

The Female Ego in the Way of Creative Instincts

She points to women’s innate insecurity. They ask for outside validation whereas their work should be about creating their own world. Instead of thinking about what might be expected of them, they should focus on a film project that will stir their passion. Born to procreate, women should trust their creative instincts.

Monk gives the example of a lawyer disillusioned by her profession as she handles class-action lawsuits. She decides to use her voice and make a film exposing the scandalous nature of such cases. It became an independent film success because her cathartic passion came through.

A topic discussed at a forum of Women in View had addressed the competitive nature of women and their lack of mutual support. Monk echoes the issue once more, pointing out that another woman’s success isn’t a threat to yours and should instead be supported as a stepping-stone.

Crisis in the Media and the Power of Networking

According to Monk, there was a major problem with Canadian media at TIFF this year because the industry is changing.

A journalist, Monk says “there is no future in journalism anymore.” Filmmakers have to cover all aspects of their work because “there is no waiting for someone to make a profile of you anymore.”

First published 2011 Suite101.com

 

Women in Film and Television: Breakfast at the Grind
(Photo Credit: MCArnott)

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

The Future of Fashion

Outlook on the 2011-2021 Trends


I wrote the article below in 2011. As 2021 comes to an end, let’s consider how the last decade turned out.


Luxury fashion designers expand to emerging markets while western fashion culture tends to introspect. The best might yet to come.

Halfway through the ten-year outlook, will we return to what was happening five years ago when a new era in fashion culture began when luxury labels appeared in retail chains. Sonia Rykiel and her lingerie and sweaters for women and girls at H&M, and Alexander McQueen’s collection for Target were among the first. After all, what is left of a designer’s name when counterfeited and outlet cheaply-produced luxury goods have tarnished or saturated a brand’s appeal? Besides, has the recession not encouraged a more creative personal style? Today, Western catwalks no longer get the lion’s share.

Designer Labels Open in Asia

Armani is setting up shop in Vietnam following a skyrocketing demand for designer goods. The Italian designer label offers its tailored suits in a classy minimalist boutique in Ho Chi Minh. Armani went way out to Ulan Bator, the capital of Mongolia.

With profits dropping in the recession-hit traditional fashion markets of America, Europe—8% drop in the UK for example—and Japan, luxury goods seek new frontiers. According to McKinsey’s research, by 2015, China will represent 20% of global luxury sales, Chinese fashionistas preferring internationally known brands.

Meanwhile, in the West, some call it recession while others perceive fatigue in following the traditional fashion-inspiring media and medium.

London-inspired Street Fashion

Fashion is one of many social criteria that define a sophisticated society, while clothing is a reflection of any culture. Most consumers cannot afford Haute Couture, but ‘haute fashion’ has always trickled down to the streets, with a twist on trends. London holds the flagship with its British free-spirited knack for self-expression. “Where there is a fashion will, there is a fashion way,” says Kate Spicer in issue 45 of the UK magazine Stylist.

According to Stylist, a survey by Draper—the fashion industry bible—indicated that 89% of 50,000 fashion industry professionals consider Oxford Street as the best place in the world for affordable fashion stores. The point is, where there is demand, there is supply. And when there is supply, individuality takes off.

Furthermore, there more merit in ‘haute fashion” than Haute Couture. After all, it is effortless and ‘safe’ to wear designer labels, whereas creating a personal style on a budget shows character and vision. Besides, the wariness about labels might be a matter of awareness, designers manufacturing cheaply in the Far East then selling expensively in the West.

This could be the key to the new trend: reality fashion. Hello, Lady Gaga…! And so, the maddening fashion week on the runways might lose its appeal in favor of fashion gathering and hunting at affordable shops, consignment stores, and other vintage outlet for street fashion.

H&M Brand Fashion Research

Fashion trend researchers watch the news, read financial magazines, analyze life on the streets, collect information from various industries, and eventually sort it out to keep what is inspiring. Finally, they interpret common signals to get a trend direction. As a result, even climate change can influence fashion.

According to the H&M Magazine 2010 edition, times have changed because today “trends can come from anywhere.” Whereas in the 60s Paris fashion houses dictated a season’s fashion, and in the 90s a concert or a celebrity hairstyle could start a trend, social media are now propelling trends globally, from anywhere and to anyone.

Celebrities might still have influence, but red carpet events might be more about the curiosity of who dares to wear what than a geniune interest in fashion trends. Fashion is even migrating into a blurred philosophical concept. Anna Laub, trend analyst at the London-based WGSN agency, expects next year’s trend to be about “fashion that looks extremely real, yet with a surreal quality. We call it ‘hype false realism,’” she says… Even expert trendsetters appear to be at a loss to express the current phenomenon.

Projection of Fashion Trends for 2011/2021

H&M Magazine predicts the following trends for 2011/2021, a clear and welcome evolution towards common sense:

  • Power comeback: Career look returns with long urban skirts, tailored dresses, blazers, and capes.
  • Organic tailoring: Inspired by climate change, mismatches, work-wear, and dark colors will be combined in a folkloric tailored look.

The upcoming ten years suggest a renaissance of “real” reality. Science will help the planet and bring much-needed optimism from new findings, generating the following trends from 2011-2021:

  • Discreet luxury: Return to craftsmanship and rejection of the “bling” culture of the 00s with discreet luxury items.
  • The serious generation: The children of the 90s will become smarter adults and focus on homes and careers leading to a boom in interior design and conservative career clothes.

And so, “reality fashion” could mean what it suggests, which Mark Jacobs endorsed in his last collection inspired by curvaceous Mad Men star Barbara Hendricks. “I wanted to go back to the era when it was glamorous simply being a woman […] You could just sit there in a beautiful dress and gloves and that was enough.”

Most of all, it’s comforting to hear that our grandchildren will buy less but better and will focus on their home. Will big walk-in closets be out? To be continued.

Sources

  • H&M Magazine. Winter 2010. Lee Madison: “Tomorrow’s Trends Today.”
  • Mckinsey Quarterly online. Tapping Chinas’ luxury goods market. April 2011.
  • Stylist Autumn-winter 2010. Collector’s Edition. “Outspoken” by Kate Spicer.
  • WGSN: Global Trends forecaster for the apparel industry

First published April 2011 Suite101.com

 

The Future of Fashion
Front Window with Children’s Fashion in Capri (MCArnott)

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories

Of Genres and Gender

The Film Industry Conundrum

Unless women direct action films, there is a slim chance they win the Best Director Award. No one knows this better than the accomplished filmmaker Nancy Meyers. At the base of this conundrum is a greater demand for action films than for chick flicks. The reason is that more men watch movies and they like action.

Best Director – The Turf of Male Filmmakers

Movies with a male in the leading role and a female in the supporting role do better in the box office than movies with females in the leading role. It happens because action movies, with gangsters, for example, don’t suit a female in the leading role (hello, Bonnie & Clyde).

To this day, Nancy Meyers is the most financially successful director in Hollywood despite having received no such award. She knows her style and sticks to it with rigorous attention to detail. Her films appeal to women, an underserved audience. They tend to feature mature women, typically affluent professionals who are concerned with their families and desired by multiple suitors. This helped her claim a spot as one of the leading female directors in Hollywood.

And yet, Philadelphia isn’t an action film. Then, the Hurt Locker was written by a man and directed by a woman–who directed a man’s movie. The Prince of Tides, a blockbuster psychological drama that earned seven awards, but none for Barbra Streisand as director raises the question. Can a film impart excellence on major filmmaking areas and not on the director?

Something could change if, for example, in the Fall of 2007, men hadn’t written 70 percent of all film reviews in the nation’s top newspapers, and women 30 percent. If action films resonate more for men than for women, wouldn’t a male voter’s choice of review affect other genres? And what is the percentage of women who vote at the Academy (the USA, and Canada)? The answer to these questions could help female filmmakers.

Some even ask why there is a Best Actor and Best Actress award, but only the Best Director Award for both? As if a woman director isn’t supposed to get one as “Best Directoress.” The truth is that masculinity and femineity define people just as they define art. If men like action and violence and women don’t …. there is no hope of solving the best director award problem when men and women are in competition. Action wins!

This brings Canada’s National Screen Institute (NSI) to ask, “Where are the Women?” They are noticeably absent, and it’s called The Celluloid Ceiling.  

Overall, women are subjected to the same biases as are black characters in films. As women get portrayed in other roles than romantic comedies and psychodramas, the movement could afford them a status with no stigma attached to gender.

Meanwhile, a 2004 national profile on employment in Canadian screen-based media found that women represent under 10 percent of directors who are members of the Directors Guild of Canada. “The statistics are appalling given the number of women in the business,” says Sadia Zaman, Executive Director at Women in Film & Television-Toronto (WIFT-T). She has dealt with this problem first-hand, through an Ontario-based program for emerging female directors that “has used just about every female director out there,” she says, “Besides, it’s hard for women to enter a male-dominated networking, and there aren’t enough men who are committed to advancing the careers of individual talented women.”

Box-Office Facts

What Women Want (2000), starring Mel Gibson as a man who tries to understand the female psyche, became the most successful film ever directed by a woman—grossing upward of $370 million worldwide. Nancy Meyers followed suit with the 2003’s Something’s Gotta Give, chronicling an unlikely relationship between a couple played by Nicholson and Diane Keaton, pulled in more than $200 million worldwide. As did her 2006 feature The Holiday, featuring Kate Winslet and Cameron Diaz. However, in Pirates of the Caribbean, prominent female actress Keira Knightly did a fabulous job in the supporting role and yet, earned $5 million while Depp earned some $25 million.

And yet, in 2007, Reese Witherspoon was the highest-paid actress commanding $15-20 million per movie. Angelina Jolie, Cameron Diaz, Sandra Bullock, Rene Zellweger, and Nicole Kidman earned $10-15 million per movie. This compares fairly with their male counterparts. Johnny Depp, Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Denzel Washington earned $15-20 million per movie.

Lack of Funding – The Bane of Women

Statistics show that the difference between men and women directors’ participation at film festivals is 48-63 percent. Perhaps women could change that.

But ultimately, it all comes down to cash. When making a film or TV project, women don’t have the same access to funding as men do. “Women are getting between 20-25 percent of the money from funding organizations in Canada,” says Roslyn Muir, head of WIFTV. Will this change as film students enter the industry? Remarkably, Twelve Angry Men was set in one room, requiring less funding.

Kathryn Bigelow says it best with her speech after her 2010 Oscar for Best Director, “… I hope I’m the first of many… I’m ever grateful if I can inspire some young, intrepid, tenacious male or female filmmaker and have them feel that the impossible is possible, and never give up on your dream.”

First published 2011 Suite101.com

Posted by Marie-Claude Arnott in Other stories